HOAKS Sebagai Konstruksi Sosial Untuk Kepentingan Politik Praktis Dalam Pilgub DKI Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v8i2.107Keywords:
Hoax, social construction, Framing, Jakarta Gubernatorial ElectionAbstract
This article describes the phenomenon of hoaks that occurred in the political momentum in Jakarta. Hoaks do not stand alone. There is a greater importance behind it. Based on data released by Kompas, during the political momentum, the distribution of hoaks is increasing. What should be discussed is the interests of hoaks and their relation to practical politics, as well as the encouraging factors for the phenomenon of hoaks. The phenomenon of hoaks will be exposed to social construction as Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckman create a theoretical framework for mass media communication. As a social construction, hoaks are related to three continuous process frameworks. Covers externalization, objectivization, and internalization. In addition, hoaks can also be approached with Framing theory. Where in the media coverage there has been a subjective interest that lies behind it. With some of these approaches, hoaks is a political phenomenon that enters the media network to construct the community according to the interests behind it. One way to construct it by doing framing and also spreading hate speech that attacked using SARA pretext against political opponents in Pilgub in DKI Jakarta
Downloads
References
Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Lukhmann. 1990. Tafsir Sosial atas Kenyataan Jakarta: LP3ES.
Bungin, H.M Burhan. 2006. Sosiologi Komunikasi: Teori, Paradigma, dan Diskursus Teknologi Komunikasi di Masyarakat. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Creswell, Jhon W. 2010. Research Design. Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Edisi Ketiga (Terjemahan). Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.
Goodman, Douglas J. Dan George Ritzer. 2004. Teori Sosiologi Modern Jakarta: Kencana.
Hammad, Ibnu. 2004. Konstruksi Sosial Politik dalam Media Massa: Sebuah Studi Critical Discourse Analysis Terhadap Berita-Berita Politik. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Mun’im DZ, H. Abdul. 2014. Benturan NU-PKI 1948-1965. Jakarta; PBNU.
Oetama, Jakob. 2001. Pers Indonesia: Berkomunikasi dengan Masyarakat Tidak Tulus. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
Polomo, Margaret M. 2010. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sobur, Alex. 2006. Analisis Teks Media: Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis Simiotik, dan Analisis Framing. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suhandang, Kustadi. 2010. Pengantar Jurnalistik: Seputar Organisasi, Produk, dan Kode Etik. Bandung: Penerbit Nuansa.
Wiryawan, Hari. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Media. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Internet
http://www.kbbionline.com/arti/gaul/hoax. Diakses 13 Juli 2017.
http://www.antaranews.com/berita/605171/apa-itu-hoax. Diakses pada 13 Juli 2017.
https://rumahfilsafat.com/2009/08/19/fenomenologi-edmund-husserl/. Diakses pada 17 September 2017.
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analisis_framing. Diakses pada 20 September 2017.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKmMPA3Y8AA. Diakses 17 September 2017
https://news.detik.com/berita/3613345/begini-cara-kerja-dan-detail-pembayaran-sindikat-saracen.
http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2017/08/24/terungkap-begini-cara-sindikat-saracen-viralkan-ujaran-kebencian-di-media-sosial.
http://news.liputan6.com/read/3070491/cara-kerja-sindikat-saracen-dalam-menyebarkan-ujaran-kebencian Dikses Tanggal 20 September 2017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Semua artikel yang dipublikasikan dapat diakses secara umum melalui online dan bersifat bebas download
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/