Implementing Debate To Improve The Speaking Skill Of The Eleventh Grade Students Of SMK 17 Agustus 1945 Muncar Banyuwangi

Authors

  • Ridwan Ridwan Institut Agama Islam Darussalam (IAIDA) Banyuwangi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v8i2.97

Keywords:

Debate, Speech Skills, English

Abstract

This study aims to improve students' speaking skills by applying the debate. Classroom action research (CAR) aims to find teaching and learning strategies that match the style of the learner and to solve teacher problems in finding the right techniques in teaching. Research conducted in SMK 17 August 1945 Muncar Banyuwangi on 39 students of class XI AK1 done in two cycles with stages of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Instruments used for data collection are observation sheets, questionnaires and student opinions about the debate. The teaching and learning procedure is divided into three steps; pre-activity, main activity, and post activity. Researchers found that the application of debate can improve students' speaking skills

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, Douglas.H. 2004. Language Assessment. Longman.
Rakhmat, Jalaludin, 2007. Psikologi komunikasi. Cetakan keduapuluhempat: PT Remaja Rosadakarya.
Mulyana, Deddy, 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi. Cetakan Ketujuh: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Trimo, Soejono, 1986. Teori-Teori Komunikasi. Remadja Karya.
Nunan David, 1991. Language Teaching Metodologi. Prantice Hall International (UK) ltd.
Brown, Douglas.H. 2001 Teaching by Principle: and Interactive Approach to Language pedagogy/H. Douglas brown. -3rd ed.p.cm.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2002, Pedoman Debate siswa di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK), Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Kejuruan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan menengah.
Chaudron, Craig 1998. Second Language classrooms. Cambridge University press.
Foley, J. A. 2005. New Dimension in Teaching of Oral Communication. Seameo Regional Language Centre. Singapore.
D’Cruz, Ray.2003.The Australia-Asia Debating Guide. The Australian Debating Federation. Australia.
Bellon, Joe.2000.A Research-Based Justification For Debate Across The Curriculum. Argumentation and Advocacy, 36(3), 161-176.Georgia State University.
Goodwin,Jean. 2003. Students’ Perspectives on Debate Exercises in Content Area Classes. Communication Education 52(2003) 157-163.
Harmer, Jeremy, 2006. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman
Hornby. 1986. Oxford Advance Dictionaries. Oxford University Press.
Latif, M.A.2008. A Comprehensive Guide to Debate Adjudication. International Islamic University Malaysia.
Wirjaatmadja, Rochiati. 2008. Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung. PT RemajaRosdakarya.
Sari, D. E., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2017). The Effectiveness Of The Method of GI With Electronic Workbench Study To Improve Activities and Results Student. Educatio : Journal of Education, 2(1), 136–150. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal.staimnglawak.ac.id/index.php/educatio/article/view/22
Asrori, Mohammad. 2008. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung. CV Wacana Prima.
Kimtafsirah Y.M., 2003. Teaching Speaking in Language Laboratory. Department of National Education PPPG Bahasa. Jakarta.
Latief, Adnan. 2003. Penelitian Tindakan kelas Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Th II, No.2, 2003.
Leo Sutanto,1995. Communicative Language Testing. Gramedia.
Noer, M.I.F,2006. Englis Debate Training. Spirit.
Susiawan,M.A 2010. Improving Speaking ability of Grade Ten Students of SMAN 2 Genteng Banyuwangi Through Debates. Unisma Malang.
Cahyono,A.D. 2009. Improving Speaking Skill at D4 Joint Program Beruff Academic Malang Through Debate Technique. Unisma Malang.
O’Malley,J.M, Pierce L.V. 1996. Authentic Assessment For English Language Learnes. Longman.
PPPG kejuruan Jakarta, 2003. Debate Berbahasa Inggris. Departemen pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta.
Tim Penyusun Modul Rayon 16 Unej. 2011. Modul Bidang Study Bahasa Inggris. FKIP Universitas Jember.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-09

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check